I have been requested to do jury jury 3 times before, and 2 of them I just waited for 4 hours and got to go home, and 1 I had to go into a whole thing because I didn't live in the state anymore. I felt like my number was coming up for a to actually sit on a jury for a case this time.
I had already delayed it for a year, so it was finally time to take my chance, and fulfill my civic duty. I got on the train at 7:30 AM, and got to the courthouse around 8:30 AM. We then proceeded to wait for 3 hours (got some book reading in), and then the jury selection began. It was a civil trial for a car accident that happened in 2018, so they only needed 7 people (I think actually only 6 were needed and 1 alternate), and there was 18 people, so my chances of being picked were low. They had actually picked 7 people, and I was ready to go home, but then they dismissed 2 people, and called me up. I told them I was in a car accident before, so I may be biased, but they didn't give a shit apparently, so I was now in the jury box.
The case started fine, the two lawyers said this was a he said/she said issue, and that an older couple was suing this this 30 something guy. The thing is that the older couple didn't speak English. This normally doesn't matter, but in a place where they have to be interviewed and cross examined through an interpreter, it unraveled pretty quickly. The lawyer for the older couple looked nice, and had an accent that I could only really parse 50% of the time. I only really understood the interpreter, and the questions for the first 2 hours of the trial were mainly just about who the old couple were, and how this crash effected them. I still had no idea what the crash even was, or what happened, which is really what this whole thing is balanced upon.
The defendant's layer was quite possibly the most hipster person I have seen since 2010. He had a bow tie, and a jacket that just needed a steam punk hat, and he would be at home at the experimental music section in any record store. He was clearly trying to "gotcha" the old couple, but he was foiled every time. For example, he would show the old lady a picture of this crashed car, and ask them if they recognize it, and they would say they don't remember. He then would still move on to the next question ("in your opinion, does this look like a car was going slow when it was in that accident?") as if the prior question had the answer they wanted, rather than the one they gave.
My favorite exchange was where they said they were in an accident in 2017, and they told their chiropractor that they had lots of back pain, but why they didn't go back in 2018? The old lady just said they weren't in business anymore, and the lawyer just said "fair enough." There was even a moment where the older couple's lawyer was trying to establish that the weather was nice and sunny on the day of the accident, and when the defendant's lawyer tried to pull a gotcha implying that the sun being out meant that they were liable for the accident, they then went unto a whole thing where they said only the weather was nice. When the defendant's lawyer tried to ask if it was sunny outside during the accident, the translator just didn't get through, and we never actually found out.
Now, maybe I have just watched too many detective shows, but since they knew the date, and the time of the accident, whether or not the sun was out during the accident isn't a mystery. This is something you can look up. I actually did look it up, and it looks like sundown was at 4:31 PM on the day of the accident, so it was probably pretty dark. This could not be said in court though, and it did make me wonder about how this happened in 2018, and yet both lawyers seemed to not be prepared for this case at all.
By the end of day 1, I was more confused about this whole incident than I was at the beginning, and we still had no idea how the crash even happened. The next day (Friday, which is my day off by the way) at 9 AM, they brought us back in the waiting room, made us wait another hour, then brought us back into the court. We sat for another 10 minutes, and then the judge said to take a break. I took this chance to get some donuts. After the break, the judge steps into the jury waiting room, tells us they are making a legal ruling that they don't need us anymore. Luckily I had donuts, but the whole thing left me so confused, that I don't even have an opinion about who was liable. I never even heard the defendant speak. It was just a bunch of hours waddling through translations, without having to actually rule on it.
It was a confounding experience. Any sense that I had done my civic duty had dissolved, but at least I now have this story to tell.